Ref:396/02

 Back to News Page
 Back to Home Page

Australia - August 27, 2002
Source: FIS
Tuna pellet research successful

Ongoing research into pelleted tuna feed has proven there is a cost effective, environmentally friendly alternative to the traditional whole pilchards and other fresh feed used on Australia's tuna farms.

Over the last four years local fish farm researcher Geoff Bayly has been perfecting the pellet technology for the farms with the results showing much progress.


Skretting representative Geoff Bayly with the latest generation of tuna pellet.
(Photo:S.Gorton)

"We have made a lot of progress in the last four to five years doing what the Japanese have been trying to do for 20 years," Mr Bayly said.

"Now Japan is looking at our technology for their northern bluefin farms."

Mr Bayley now manages the tuna division of Skretting, a part of the multi-national aquaculture corporation Nutreco, and the success has not gone unnoticed with strong interest being shown in the pellets in the tuna farming nations such as Spain, Malta, Mexico and others.

Nutreco's interest goes further as the European-based company also has shown an interest in becoming involved in tuna farming off Port Lincoln, Mr Bayley said.

"After being involved in salmon farming, they are seeing the benefits of getting involved in the Port Lincoln tuna industry," he said.

Research into the pellet feeding technique has been made possible with the support of the Aquafin Cooperative Research Centre and the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, with the Stehr Group also being involved, he said.

Much of the research has taken place on four pontoons, two of which contained pellet-fed fish while the other two held fish fed the traditional pilchard fish.

These research fish, leased through the cooperation of the Tuna Boat Owners Association, were farmed by the Stehr Group, who also currently feed pellets to about half of all its fish and plan to do even more next season.

The results from the studies show that food conversion ratios had improved significantly from 15 to 1 with pilchards to 5 to 1 for pellets (five tonnes of pellets turns into one tonne of tuna flesh).

Pellets had a higher protein and fat content than pilchards and that meant lower volumes were needed, with 220 tonnes of pellets having the equivalent nutritional value of 500 tonnes of pilchards.

Remote underwater video cameras proved that much of the pellet material made it through the cages and seagulls were less attracted to the pellets, Mr Bayly said.

Another benefit was the cooking process that helped eliminate diseases or pathogens.

But all of these improvements would mean nothing if the Japanese were not impressed with the product quality.

Mr Bayly emphasised that the pellet was not meant to replace locally caught pilchards but could be used in tandem with fresh product thereby reducing even further demand on expensive and restricted imported baitfish.

Pellet fed fish was getting a good reception from tuna buyers, with some even noting the fish lacked the distinctive pilchard odour associated with some farmed fish, he said.

"The results have been good fish growth, good colour and good fat content," Mr Bayly said.

The pellets contain fishmeal currently produced from anchovies and sardines from Chile, supplemented with fish oil, a vitamin and mineral mix all held together with wheat gluten.

Skretting markets the pellet as being free of land animal byproducts, antibiotics, growth promoters or genetically modified ingredients, he said.

One of the major hurdles to overcome was introducing the wild fish from the Bight to the manufactured pellets.

Mr Bayly said significant time was spent on developing techniques to wean the freshly caught tuna off fresh baitfish and onto the pellets, with the process taking between seven and 10 days.

The interest of the European companies in Australian tuna farming operations has not gone unnoticed within the local tuna industry.

The fact that multinational companies such as Nutreco were showing an interest in expanding their stake in the industry did not surprise Australian tuna industry spokesman Brian Jeffriess.

"It's understandable that there would be that type of interest," he said.

Norwegian company Stolt Sea Farm was already the second biggest tuna company in Port Lincoln and it was not unreasonable that one their major competitors was showing an interest, he said.

These companies made it their policy to integrate or take-on all aspects of an industry, from feed manufacturer to the actual farming to the marketing of final product, he said.

The success of Nutreco's tuna pellet development off Port Lincoln could be another motivating factor for the company to become involved, he said.

The innovative generation of Port Lincoln fishers that pioneered tuna farming could not stay involved for ever and decisions were being individually made as to how the industry should moved forward, he said.

In same cases the new generations were taking over and in other cases new groups of people were becoming involved, he said.

"I believe all the companies are moving toward becoming more global," Mr Jeffriess said.

By Stan Gorton
FIS.com

More about:- More about:-

Quick Jump Menu

Email  this page
 

 Print out this page
 

 


Top of  Page

Home II About Us II FAQ II News II Events II Newsletters II Join II Contact Us
Suppliers
II Invest II Species II Training II Knowledge Base II Glossary II Research
Links
II Code of Conduct II Associations II Site Map II Privacy Statement II Disclaimer

Copyright © Gippsland Aquaculture Industry Network Inc. 2001/2002 - All Rights Reserved

This website is managed by Gippstek Online®  on behalf of GAIN
Please direct any enquiries regarding this  website to
webmaster@growfish.com.au

 

Copyright © Gippsland Aquaculture Industry Network Inc. 2001/2002 - All Rights Reserved