Good Business, by John
Dallimore, columnist, Fish Farming International
Localisation, not globalisation. A new word for our
vocabulary, perhaps, but certainly a theme that should
be considered, and a theme that I addressed at the
recent Bradan 2002 conference in Ireland.
The basis for this discussion is how to improve a
sector’s performance in a global industry; where
prices and margins are constantly under pressure, and
it’s the small players verses the global ones.
The salmon sector is potentially the most mature in
terms of production technology and marketing. Only
last year we saw prices under severe pressure and it
was suggested that there was a 20% over production
against market demand.
Producers, notably Chile (down by 62,000 tonnes from
last year) have reduced their output, and prices have
recovered a little. That is a responsible response to
the situation, but for smaller producers who wish to
expand their industry, not really interesting.
The question for smaller groups in the industry must
focus on how to create better returns for their
sector, in a market where they are currently
unrecognisable. In this case: “Who has heard of Irish
Salmon?”
Scotland, with its SQS and “Label Rouge” which is
recognised in France, has gone down this path to a
degree, and is benefiting from a recognisable image.
Other smaller companies in Scotland have also
developed organic or animal friendly labels from which
they can create better margins, so the precedence is
there.
However, the issue of a country wide industry
functioning as a label is yet to be addressed.
If we examine Ireland in more detail we note;
- Salmon production
2002 – 25,000 tonnes valued at about €80 million
Sector employs about 5,000 persons directly with
7,000 in service sector
- Aquaculture sector
supplies 1 in 3 fish from Ireland and 43% by value
- Extremely important
to coastal communities and maintaining the Irish
culture
- Is the only fish
sector which has the potential for growth (50,000
tonnes by 2007)?
When this is put
alongside the overall production for Atlantic salmon,
which is approaching 1 million tonnes, Irish
production is totally lost. In fact in Germany where I
am based, imports exceed 80,000 tonnes per year, so
the Irish production could only supply 30% of this
market, let alone anyone else!!
When you are faced with these facts it almost seems
that there is little point in investing or trying to
develop the sector; that’s unless you’re Irish, of
course, and for the local economy it is a potential
winner.
In this case though Ireland has an advantage in being
Irish, and if you look at almost any sector or
producer it is possible to find a USP – Unique Selling
Position – which will enable a sector to identify
itself and its products.
If you say “salmon” to a German, they will always
associate it with Norway – an excellent generic
marketing campaign. However if you say Guinness,
Ireland is the answer, and both are examples of USPs.
For Ireland, the sector needs to create a USP – in
this case a Unique Salmon Product.
Branding is nothing new, but it is essential to create
niche markets. In the Irish situation I feel that
there is a great potential to trade on Ireland itself
and create a brand that reflects quality, environment
and ethical benefits.
Twenty-five thousand tonnes is not a large volume, and
if correctly focused could be branded and find better
margins in the world market by targeting
regional/local markets, not the world at large.
In Ireland’s case this could be linked to tourism. A
group of farms in Ireland were visited by over 40,000
tourists this year who paid €12 per person per boat
trip. What great advertising!!
But where do these tourists come from? I know that
there are significant numbers of tourists in Ireland
from the USA, Germany, France and the UK, so shouldn’t
these areas be the first targets for the Irish brand?
But that is only the start.
Why do tourists come to Ireland, and how can these
reasons be translated in to USPs which create
awareness and interest to buy products when they
return home?
It has been interesting to note that all through the
BSE (mad cow) disease problems, Irish beef and Irish
dairy products (notably Kerry-Gold butter) have been
available in Germany.
Why?
The Irish image has allowed sales and consumers
respect the Irish quality, so why not for Irish
salmon? If people are visiting the farms, then they
can see the superior methods used for raising Irish
salmon, in ethically and environmentally sensitive
ways - can’t they? If not, why not?
Because this is a golden opportunity to show the Irish
brand, especially when the activists are doing
everything they can to put down the industry. Ireland
can be different, but marketing is not the only action
that could be taken.
However as good the product is or can be, and even
when margins can be improved by accessing niche
markets, the industry itself must also be looking at
ways to improve production costs.
The idea of clusters is an interesting one, especially
when a sector is operating at a relatively low
geographical spread. In the case of the Irish farms,
from north to south is not more than 4 hours by car.
An ideal opportunity for creating a cluster.
All of the sector use feeds, and services that are
pretty much identical, so why not try to pool these
resources, or negotiate as a single entity, or market
all of the products under a single organisation (70%
is already marketed by the ISPG)?
Although individual companies would still be
individual, there is great potential to act as a
single body to get the best discounts from suppliers,
exchange information and benefit from marketing
activities, all of which could improve margins, as has
been seen in Chile.
A united face also has a greater influence on policy
makers, and in Ireland that is essential. There cannot
be many aquaculture sectors where there are companies
doing the same thing yet are affected in so many
different ways by inconsistent legislation.
It is time that the sector receives an even hand and
supporting legislation to assist in its operation.
The Irish situation is only an example, but all
producers and operators in aquaculture need to review
their operations and identities. Companies now need to
consider differentiation and identification which
should be created by communication.
Don’t be a voice in a crowd, look to find the spaces
where you can be heard.
Please contact
the
Editor of Fish Farming
International
for any further information on this article
|